Lufthansa has officially joined a growing roster of major international airlines—including Singapore Airlines, Qatar Airways, Emirates, Air India, Delta, United, and Japan Airlines—in rolling out new restrictions on the in-flight use of power banks.

The move comes amid mounting concerns over fire risks associated with lithium-ion batteries, as airlines worldwide tighten safety protocols to prevent midair incidents caused by overheating or faulty battery packs.

What’s Changing?
Passengers are still permitted to bring power banks in their carry-on bags, but under the new rules, these devices must remain off and unplugged for the entire flight. Charging your phone or tablet from a power bank midair is now strictly prohibited.

This policy shift, while subtle, is rooted in a serious safety concern: lithium-ion batteries, especially if damaged or poorly manufactured, can overheat and, in rare cases, catch fire—a risk that has already materialized more than once at cruising altitude.

Why the Crackdown?
For many travelers, a power bank is as essential as a passport, especially on long-haul flights. But these compact devices pack significant energy.

If a battery malfunctions—due to damage, manufacturing defects, or overheating—it can spark, smoke, or ignite. At 35,000 feet, even a small fire poses a major threat, with no fire department to call and limited resources to contain an emergency.

Fires involving lithium-ion batteries on planes have surged nearly 400% since 2015, now occurring almost twice a week, according to FAA data. Most incidents stem from damaged, defective, or counterfeit batteries, which can enter "thermal runaway," an uncontrolled release of energy that can lead to smoke, fire, or even explosions.

How Are Airlines Responding?
Lufthansa’s policy is part of a global trend toward stricter cabin safety standards. Here’s how other major carriers are handling the issue:

• Qatar Airways: Power banks are allowed in carry-on luggage (under 100Wh), but must remain off and unplugged during the flight.
• Emirates: Passengers can carry power banks, but cannot use or charge them onboard.
• Singapore Airlines: As of April 2025, passengers are not allowed to charge power banks or use them to charge devices during flight. Only power banks under 100Wh are allowed without special approval.
• Air India: No use or charging of power banks is permitted in-flight; devices must remain off.
• Delta, United, Japan Airlines: Similar restrictions apply—power banks must be off and not in use once the aircraft door closes.
• China Southern, Cathay Pacific: Charging is forbidden; using a power bank midair can result in confiscation or intervention by cabin crew.

What Should Travelers Do?
If you rely on a power bank for long flights, these new rules may seem inconvenient, but they are designed to protect everyone onboard. Here’s how to stay compliant:

• Pack power banks only in your carry-on, never in checked luggage.
• Ensure your power bank’s capacity is below the airline’s limit (usually 100Wh or 27,000mAh); anything above may require special approval.
• Do not use or charge your power bank during the flight unless the airline explicitly allows it.
• Be prepared to switch off and stow the device if instructed by cabin crew.

The good news: most modern international aircraft now offer USB outlets and charging points at every seat, reducing the need for personal power banks in-flight.

A Broader Aviation Trend
Lufthansa’s policy is not an isolated move, but part of a wider industry shift as airlines adapt to the surge in passenger electronics.

From smart bags to e-bikes, the aviation sector is rethinking what’s safe to carry in the cabin, especially as flights return to full capacity post-pandemic.

Regulators and airlines are expected to continue tightening rules around battery-powered devices in the months ahead.

On May 22, 2025, British Airways Flight BA118, a Boeing 777, took off from Bengaluru’s Kempegowda International Airport at 7:40 AM local time, bound for London Heathrow. However, just three hours into the journey, while cruising near Abu Dhabi airspace, the flight encountered a technical issue that forced a dramatic mid-air U-turn back to Bengaluru.

The aircraft’s crew reported a malfunction in the Traffic Collision Avoidance System (TCAS), a critical safety system designed to prevent mid-air collisions by monitoring nearby aircraft. This prompted the captain to take the precautionary measure of returning to the departure airport to ensure passenger safety.

Passengers on board experienced delays and limited information during the wait. Satish Medapati, a passenger, shared updates on social media, noting the return but mentioning no distress or discomfort among travelers. Upon landing safely back at Bengaluru, the aircraft underwent a thorough technical inspection by engineers, who cleared it for takeoff later that afternoon at 2:30 PM to resume its journey to London Heathrow.

This incident occurred amid broader operational challenges at London Heathrow Airport, where a fire-induced power outage on May 21 caused significant disruptions. Despite early concerns that Heathrow might remain closed for several days, British Airways managed to operate about 90% of its scheduled flights on the following Saturday and anticipated near-normal operations by Sunday, reflecting the airline’s resilience in managing disruptions.

The BA118 incident is not isolated. Earlier in April 2025, British Airways Flight 216 from Washington, DC, to London made an emergency landing in Boston after a suspected bird strike and reports of smoke in the cabin. The crew’s swift action ensured a safe landing with no injuries, underscoring the airline’s commitment to safety protocols.

British Airways reaffirmed that passenger safety remains its top priority, emphasizing that the decision to return BA118 was made out of caution. The airline continues to coordinate closely with aviation authorities and airport teams to minimize inconvenience and maintain operational integrity during such events.

This mid-air U-turn highlights the complexities and challenges of modern aviation, where safety systems and crew vigilance play a crucial role in protecting passengers, even if it means turning back mid-journey to address technical concerns promptly.

On May 22, 2025, the skies above Brazil unleashed a fierce thunderstorm that brought Emirates flight EK261—a flagship Airbus A380 route from Dubai to São Paulo—to an unexpected halt. Moments before landing at São Paulo’s Guarulhos International Airport (GRU), the world’s largest passenger aircraft encountered violent weather conditions that forced the pilots to abort the final approach and divert to Rio de Janeiro’s Galeão International Airport (GIG).

Lightning cracked and winds surged as visibility plunged below 2 kilometers and cloud ceilings dropped to just 800 feet, making landing at GRU unsafe. The flight crew swiftly climbed back to 25,000 feet and initiated a rare diversion for such a large aircraft, prioritizing passenger safety amid the storm’s fury. The A380, registered A6-EVP, touched down safely at GIG, where passengers awaited improved conditions before continuing the final 40-minute leg to São Paulo.

This incident highlights the growing challenges airlines face due to increasing atmospheric instability during seasonal transitions in Brazil. Thunderstorms like this can form rapidly and intensify, reducing advance warning times and complicating flight operations at busy hubs like GRU—the country’s busiest international airport. The diversion caused a ripple effect of delays across domestic carriers, underscoring the need for enhanced predictive analytics, storm tracking, and infrastructure resilience to manage climate-driven disruptions.

For Emirates, the event tested the airline’s operational agility and crew preparedness on one of its premier long-haul routes serving Latin America. Despite the disruption, the quick decision-making and safe handling of the A380 demonstrated robust flight management systems and a commitment to passenger safety.

Passengers endured an unexpected detour that extended their journey and disrupted connections, but the incident serves as a stark reminder that even the largest, most advanced aircraft are vulnerable to nature’s forces. As climate volatility continues to impact global air travel, airlines and airports must evolve to maintain reliability and safety in an increasingly turbulent sky.

In sum, Emirates flight EK261’s storm-driven diversion from São Paulo to Rio de Janeiro is a vivid case study in aviation’s new normal—where skill, technology, and adaptability meet the unpredictable power of weather.

Lufthansa has officially joined a growing roster of major international airlines—including Singapore Airlines, Qatar Airways, Emirates, Air India, Delta, United, and Japan Airlines—in rolling out new restrictions on the in-flight use of power banks.

The move comes amid mounting concerns over fire risks associated with lithium-ion batteries, as airlines worldwide tighten safety protocols to prevent midair incidents caused by overheating or faulty battery packs.

What’s Changing?
Passengers are still permitted to bring power banks in their carry-on bags, but under the new rules, these devices must remain off and unplugged for the entire flight. Charging your phone or tablet from a power bank midair is now strictly prohibited.

This policy shift, while subtle, is rooted in a serious safety concern: lithium-ion batteries, especially if damaged or poorly manufactured, can overheat and, in rare cases, catch fire—a risk that has already materialized more than once at cruising altitude.

Why the Crackdown?
For many travelers, a power bank is as essential as a passport, especially on long-haul flights. But these compact devices pack significant energy.

If a battery malfunctions—due to damage, manufacturing defects, or overheating—it can spark, smoke, or ignite. At 35,000 feet, even a small fire poses a major threat, with no fire department to call and limited resources to contain an emergency.

Fires involving lithium-ion batteries on planes have surged nearly 400% since 2015, now occurring almost twice a week, according to FAA data. Most incidents stem from damaged, defective, or counterfeit batteries, which can enter "thermal runaway," an uncontrolled release of energy that can lead to smoke, fire, or even explosions.

How Are Airlines Responding?
Lufthansa’s policy is part of a global trend toward stricter cabin safety standards. Here’s how other major carriers are handling the issue:

• Qatar Airways: Power banks are allowed in carry-on luggage (under 100Wh), but must remain off and unplugged during the flight.
• Emirates: Passengers can carry power banks, but cannot use or charge them onboard.
• Singapore Airlines: As of April 2025, passengers are not allowed to charge power banks or use them to charge devices during flight. Only power banks under 100Wh are allowed without special approval.
• Air India: No use or charging of power banks is permitted in-flight; devices must remain off.
• Delta, United, Japan Airlines: Similar restrictions apply—power banks must be off and not in use once the aircraft door closes.
• China Southern, Cathay Pacific: Charging is forbidden; using a power bank midair can result in confiscation or intervention by cabin crew.

What Should Travelers Do?
If you rely on a power bank for long flights, these new rules may seem inconvenient, but they are designed to protect everyone onboard. Here’s how to stay compliant:

• Pack power banks only in your carry-on, never in checked luggage.
• Ensure your power bank’s capacity is below the airline’s limit (usually 100Wh or 27,000mAh); anything above may require special approval.
• Do not use or charge your power bank during the flight unless the airline explicitly allows it.
• Be prepared to switch off and stow the device if instructed by cabin crew.

The good news: most modern international aircraft now offer USB outlets and charging points at every seat, reducing the need for personal power banks in-flight.

A Broader Aviation Trend
Lufthansa’s policy is not an isolated move, but part of a wider industry shift as airlines adapt to the surge in passenger electronics.

From smart bags to e-bikes, the aviation sector is rethinking what’s safe to carry in the cabin, especially as flights return to full capacity post-pandemic.

Regulators and airlines are expected to continue tightening rules around battery-powered devices in the months ahead.

A luxury Boeing 747-8, once the prized possession of the Qatari royal family, was officially gifted to the United States this week, with the Pentagon confirming it will serve as a new Air Force One for President Donald Trump. The deal, reportedly valued at around $200 million, was finalized Wednesday after days of speculation—making it likely the largest foreign gift ever accepted by the US federal government.

The US Air Force now faces the urgent task of retrofitting the opulent “flying palace” to meet the rigorous security demands of presidential transport. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell stated: “The secretary of defense has accepted a Boeing 747 from Qatar in accordance with all federal rules and regulations. The Department of Defense will work to ensure proper security measures and functional-mission requirements are considered for an aircraft used to transport the president of the United States.”

Experts warn that converting the jet into a secure presidential aircraft will be both costly and time-intensive, requiring advanced missile defense systems and technology to protect against nuclear threats. Air Force Secretary Troy Meink emphasized the commitment to safety: “We will make sure that we do what’s necessary to ensure security of the aircraft.”

The move comes as Boeing struggles with delays in delivering two new, custom-built 747-8s for the Air Force One program, now expected no earlier than 2027. The Qatari gift offers a temporary solution, but lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have voiced concerns about rushed security upgrades under presidential pressure. Senator Tammy Duckworth expressed worries over potential corners being cut on operational security if the aircraft is pushed into service too quickly.

After President Trump’s term, reports indicate the jet will be donated to the Trump presidential library, allowing him continued access as a private citizen—raising questions under the Constitution’s emoluments clause, which bars officials from accepting foreign gifts. However, White House lawyers have deemed the arrangement legally permissible.

Qatar’s prime minister has dismissed any suggestion the gift is meant to influence US policy, calling such claims unfounded: “I don’t see any, honestly, a valid reason for that.”

With the White House eager to put the new Air Force One into service as soon as possible, the world is watching to see if this unprecedented gift will soar above controversy or land in the midst of political turbulence.